In times of political correctness it is dangerous to debate different ideas. However, Martin Armstrong gives a pretty good overview about the system we are in. Same mechanics for a long time already. The most important message comes at the end of his video – I hope you will enjoy and afterwards start a debate!
Similar Posts
“The real danger comes from massive state dependence” – Part II
Share this articleINTERVIEW WITH H.S.H. PRINCE MICHAEL OF LIECHTENSTEIN – Part II of II Claudio Grass (CG): Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve witnessed extreme efforts to increase top-down control and to centralize power in ways that affect almost all aspects of a citizen’s life. Do you expect that…
Investing in crypto the sound way!
Share this articleInterview with Christian Zulliger I have long been fascinated by the far-reaching consequences and the great potential of the wave of new technologies and ideas that emerged with the crypto revolution. While most of us first came into contact with these concepts in 2017, this tectonic shift that…
“Bank walk”: The first domino to fall?
Share this articleIn early May, Reuters published a report that truly captured my attention. “European savers are pulling more of their money from banks, looking for a better deal as lenders resist paying up to hold on to deposits some feel they can currently live without,” the article reported. Over in the…
Missing the forest for the tree
Share this articleOver the second half of January, we witnessed a fresh wave of volatility in equity markets, culminating in a pullback that caused widespread concern and endless headlines in the mainstream financial press. There was speculation of a full blown correction, other “experts” disagreed and predicted that central bankers would…
Is the West repeating India’s mistakes? – Part II
Share this articleInterview with Jayant Bhandari Claudio Grass (CG): In such a vast and incredibly diverse country like India, can top-down measures and centralized policies like affirmative action or caste-based economic incentives effectively force social change and economic equality? Or can they be seen as merely symbolic moves, or perhaps…
One Comment